Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Automotive Technology and Advice > Re: twin cam 2....
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 11 Topic 21263 of 21647
Post > Topic >>

Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9

by "HLS" <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 13, 2008 at 09:18 AM

"C. E. White" <cewhite3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:48299c23
> I was under the impression that the Ecotech fours were decent.
>
> Ed

I believe that Ian has said that they are pretty good little engines.
Father-in-law has one in his little GMC pickup truck.. It is gutless and
sucks gas, but have had no real engine problems at 30,000 miles.

Gets 17-18 mpg.

It has had two alternators go out, body noise will drive you nuts, and a
few
other things, but at least no head gaskets, manifold gaskets, etc yet.
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
twin cam 2.4 ld9
bob urz <soundu2@[EMAI  2008-05-02 11:15:59 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
Steve Austin <saustin4  2008-05-02 19:14:23 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"HLS" <nospa  2008-05-02 19:33:06 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
William H. Bowen <wh_b  2008-05-03 13:08:29 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"Vaughn" <ba  2008-05-04 03:41:23 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"mr.som ting wong&qu  2008-05-04 11:45:12 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"C. E. White" &  2008-05-13 09:47:16 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"HLS" <nospa  2008-05-13 09:18:22 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"C. E. White" &  2008-05-13 10:49:25 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"HLS" <nospa  2008-05-13 07:58:44 
Re: twin cam 2.4 ld9
"John S." <h  2008-05-13 09:34:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 16:34:55 CDT 2008.