Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Autos - Cars > Automotive Technology and Advice > Re: Stupid "fre...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 21292 of 21753
Post > Topic >>

Re: Stupid "free energy" idea

by Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 12:30 PM

travisgod@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> 
>> Is the fuel consumption the same if you coast downhill with the engine
on
>> but the clutch pressed and/or the transmission in neutral?


Depends on the car. An old carbureted car will burn the same amount, 
within a percent or two. A modern car will burn ZERO fuel if you keep it 
in gear, but will burn a constant small amount in neutral to keep the 
engine spinning.

> 
> the fuel consumption is the same WHILE you are going downhill,
> HOWEVER, in SOME cases, overcoming engine compression requires
> ADDITIONAL fuel.

For an old carbureted car, you're right. For everything built since, oh, 
1990, you're wrong.
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"travisgod@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 07:36:22 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"Mortimer" <  2008-05-08 16:51:29 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-14 12:30:28 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sat Jul 26 16:33:41 CDT 2008.