Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Auto Tech > Re: Stupid "fre...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 3 Topic 21343 of 22268
Post > Topic >>

Re: Stupid "free energy" idea

by "travisgod@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <travisgod@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 11:06 AM

> Depends on the car. An old carbureted car will burn the same amount,
> within a percent or two. A modern car will burn ZERO fuel if you keep it
> in gear, but will burn a constant small amount in neutral to keep the
> engine spinning.

Sigh.   Some hills are insufficient to overcome engine compression,
especially at high speeds.  Gravitic acceleration < drag deceleration
+ engine compression deceleration.

JFC, do you guys even OWN cars?

> For an old carbureted car, you're right. For everything built since, oh,
> 1990, you're wrong.

Dude, please just shut the **** up.  Go find a minor decline and drive
down it in gear versus not.  Find one where being in gear slows you
down and being in neutral doesn't.  This should not be hard to find at
ALL.

Trav
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"travisgod@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-14 11:06:07 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-14 16:43:55 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"Wayne Dobson"   2008-05-15 05:30:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 3:39:29 CST 2008.