Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Car and Auto Forums > Auto Tech > Re: Stupid "fre...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 6 Topic 21351 of 22266
Post > Topic >>

Re: Stupid "free energy" idea

by "travisgod@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <travisgod@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 15, 2008 at 08:40 AM

> Name me ONE vehicle on the market which leaves the torque-convertor
> lockup clutch engaged upon deceleration.

ALL OF THEM DO.

LET OFF THE ****ING GAS ON THE FREEWAY AND WATCH ENGINE RPMs.

WTF, do you people never drive!?!??!  How can you say such STUPID ****
all the ****in time?

> What part of the principle of conservation of energy do you not
> understand? The energy required to keep the engine rotating HAS to come
> from somewhere. It can either come from a slight drag on the car, or
> from burning fuel directly. There's no magic savings which you presume
> exists.

God damn, you people are dense.

The comparison is between HAVING TO USE FUEL TO OVERCOME ENGINE
COMPRESSION or going to IDLE.

Trav
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"travisgod@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-15 08:40:10 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-15 16:27:17 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"Mortimer" <  2008-05-15 22:46:27 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-16 08:50:37 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
"Mortimer" <  2008-05-16 17:21:36 
Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
Steve <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-19 12:09:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 1:56:30 CST 2008.